Comparison as a strategy for the study of the State in Uruguay: origin and development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22187/rfd2024n57a4Keywords:
Uruguayan State, comparative method, Constitutional Law, comparative politicsAbstract
In this paper we compare the use of the comparative method in constitutional law and in political science. To do this, we have reconstructed the development of both disciplines around the academic study of the State, since its emergence in the Faculty of Law in the 19th century, and its gradual complexity due to the progressive autonomization of political science starting in the first half of the 20th century. This itinerary allowed us to appreciate the laborious process of construction and mutation of a field of study in the social sciences, in connection with different historical contexts.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This journal provides open access to its content, based on the principle that providing the public with free access to research helps a greater global exchange of knowledge
Revista de la Facultad de Derecho. Creative Commons Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacional License.