Comparison as a strategy for the study of the State in Uruguay: origin and development

  • José Miguel Busquets Catedrático de Ciencia Política en la Universidad de la República; profesor titular en la Facultad de Derecho en la Universidad de la República; investigador nivel I en el Sistema Nacional de Investigadores (ANII, Uruguay). Facultad de Derecho; Facultad de Ciencias Sociales (Udelar).
  • Óscar Sarlo Catedrático de Filosofía y Teoría del Derecho (retirado) de la Universidad de la República; profesor en la Escuela de Posgrados de la Facultad de Derecho; investigador nivel II en el Sistema Nacional de Investigadores (ANII, Uruguay); miembro de las academias Nacional de Letras y Nacional de Derecho de Uruguay; miembro correspondiente del Kuratorium del Hans Kelsen-Institut (Viena).
Keywords: Uruguayan State, comparative method, Constitutional Law, comparative politics

Abstract

In this paper we compare the use of the comparative method in constitutional law and in political science. To do this, we have reconstructed the development of both disciplines around the academic study of the State, since its emergence in the Faculty of Law in the 19th century, and its gradual complexity due to the progressive autonomization of political science starting in the first half of the 20th century. This itinerary allowed us to appreciate the laborious process of construction and mutation of a field of study in the social sciences, in connection with different historical contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2024-06-07
How to Cite
Busquets, J. M., & Sarlo, Óscar. (2024). Comparison as a strategy for the study of the State in Uruguay: origin and development. Revista De La Facultad De Derecho, (57), e20245704. https://doi.org/10.22187/rfd2024n57a4
Section
Special contributions